Discussion About Moderators
Offline
Sparty: like every normal user does. Forum
Unreal Software Discussion About Moderators Sparty: like every normal user does. Black Wolf: Nobody should get banned for wrong/no reasons. It happens though. Moderators are just humans as well and humans do mistakes.
If you get banned and think it's unfair (PLEASE check the rules carefully first and also take a look at the ban reason if any is provided!) you can report it to me. I want to do my best to keep everything as fair as possible. Again: Please do me the favor to make 100% sure and to check twice BEFORE contacting me. It's probably even better not to report on the first case but only if you experience it multiple times. As said before: everyone can make mistakes but those shouldn't be repeated!
Please do not say stuff like "mod xyz will ban me for this". I'm not sure if you are aware of it but it's provocation. Just imagine you're a mod and someone says that about you and you'll understand. It's not fair. It's not cool. I totally hate seeing crap like this. Could actually ban you for it 
§3.1 - No posts which offend/provoke/insult (flame) but I won't do so because I see that you are uncomfortable with the behavior of a mod and just don't know how to handle it correctly. Useigor removed my sig twice and edited it once, then banned me for
§5.1 - Show good behavior and simply don't be a stupid asshole .First time he was right, it was a flashing gif. Wasn't too flashy, but I see where was coming from.
Second time it was what I have now. He said he opened it up in another browser and it was animated there, therefore its apng and therefore he removed it. Of course that's total made up nonsense, a different browser won't just change an image into another.
Third time I added the text "Useigor keeps removing my signatures, send help". He edited that out and banned me. Only for a few hours, but still.
When I said that in a thread, Useigor responded with "It's waste of time to argue with you because you knowingly mix false with true. I guess you just have fun doing this." Wow. I couldn't respond cause Zero banned me there and DC trashed the thread but eh.
Now was he in the right? First time I guess, but after that? Not only did he lie a few times, he just banned me for an invalid reason because he didn't feel like having an argument. I still have all the PMs if you don't believe me.
Btw: I made a screenshot of this post. Just in case Useigor deletes it and bans me for no reason again.
useigor: on hatin sigs, And I got my removed for some reason..I forgot but @ Starkkz: knows what im talking about 
Seekay: Most browsers don't support APNG so it's actually possible that this image is not animated in one browser but is animated in another. I don't see any animation though (I even downloaded Firefox to check). However the "anal" in it might occur offensive to some people. I also see how you had signatures like Quote
andI eat ass
Quote
are you a cunt?
before which might have made him overcautious (and also might have provoked him). So you can't say that you're completely innocent in this case...
@
Sparty: Reporting stuff like this without background info can't and won't lead to anything. Especially because it seems like it was too long ago to be still in the logs. Sorry. THEMUD removed a signature that said "Useigor keeps removing my signature, Send help" cause I read it and laughed about it.However,
Seekay, as DC said, people make mistakes. You got your bagel signature and all is well, you should report it if he makes the same mistake (if it even was a mistake to begin with) again. Seekay, My PM to you has written
APNG is not popular therefore i didn't removed your signature in second time. I guess "PNG" was animated because i saved both images (GIF, PNG) and probably opened GIF file in another browser.I will remove annoying/distracting apng signatures if apng gets the popularity.
So what we have: i removed once - you say twice, i gave you 1 hour - you say few.
Sparty: that's true.. confirmed. useigor: Stop lying, you removed it more than once. I sent you a PM whenever you did that. Admittingly the one with "are you high" was a bit provocative, but that's cause you made up bullshit about a png being an apng in a different browser. And fine, it was just one hour, I logged out before you banned me and when I came back the ban lasted a few more minutes, I guess I didn't read the time stamp correctly. Still an unjustified ban.@
DC: Those previous sigs were silly inside jokes, really. They weren't directed to anyone. The Anal Bagels is a community/clan, by the way. It's simply in the name. Clicking on the image actually leads you to their website. Seekay: I'm well aware that it is a community/clan. Maybe others are not aware of it though. Even (or especially) when you're previous signatures were "inside jokes": Very bad idea. Nobody gets them except for the few insiders. Everyone else is potentially offended so you must expect punishment. 
Black Wolf: Because those " Yates for moderator" signatures are annoying, over sized and pointless. They are perceived by me as a bad attempt of trolling. Also moderator "suggestions" should be limited to the related thread and don't belong into signatures.If you want to see the rule it violates.. well.. closest match is probably
§5.2 - No advertisement, ref-links, clan threads and forum gamesas this is basically canvassing (which is a type of advertisement).
Black Wolf: Well, i still don't understand who exactly made that thing "Yates for Moderator" and so on...What is the purpose for it? (since other people told me like Rainoth that Yates won't become a moderator).
@
DC: There are other people who still use such signatures like yates for moderator, so Glix is not the only one. GeoB99: Pretty sure Majatek made the first one. Can't remember what the occasion was though. It's been fun to watch ever since haha. Yates as a moderator. Yates will be banned for §4.5 - Stick to the point! No off-topic posts!, so stop going off-topic now. This thread was made to discuss about moderators in general, not about Yates.@
DC: From now I'm going to take that as an instruction. Starkkz: The topic should be "Discussion about current moderators" but I guess you're right. Admin/mod comment
Thanks for pointing that out, I just read the title but I forgot to read the first post. /Starkkz Yates? This topic is about moderators and them good work here.Anyway,
useigor is still a great mod (that's my opinion, don't start flame on me).